Harold Camping’s Followers: A Year After the Non-Apocalypse, Where Are They Now?

Tom Bartlett wrote a powerful, heart-breaking article entitled “A Year After the Non-Apocalypse: Where Are They Now?“, which discusses Harold Camping’s end-times prediction of May 21, 2011, and the fallout of the failed prophecy.

Here is an excerpt:

“If you’re absolutely sure the world is going to end on a specific day, and it doesn’t, what do you do? How do you explain it to yourself? What happens to your faith in God? Can you just scrape the bumper stickers off your car, throw away the t-shirts, and move on?

In order to find out, I got to know a dozen or so believers prior to the scheduled apocalypse. I sat at their kitchen tables, attended their meetings, tagged along on trips to Wal-Mart, ate pizza in their hotel rooms, spent hours with them on the phone. Then, after Jesus was a no-show, I stayed in contact with them — the ones who would talk to me, anyway — over the following days and months, checking back in to see how or if their thinking had changed.

I learned a lot about the seductive power of radical belief, the inscrutable vagaries of Biblical interpretation, and how our minds can shape reality to fit a narrative. I also learned that you don’t have to be nuts to believe something crazy.”

Click here for the full article >>

As an ex- Seventh-day Adventist, a denomination that is forever connected to the failed prophecy of the Millerite movement, I have many friends and relatives who believe the end of the world is just around the corner – one going so far as to recently tell me that he is “100% sure” that Jesus will come in the next 10 years. So this is a topic that is very dear to my heart.

I have been studying the psychology behind end-times beliefs for a few months now and am planning for it to be the next topic that I address in my “Featured Documents“, but that is still quite some time away. However, I can’t imagine I would ever come close to covering the issue as eloquently as Tom Bartlett did in his article today. So go ahead and check it out.

Comments { 0 }

God: The Moral Middleman

“If one argues, as many deeply religious individuals do, that without God there can be no ultimate right and wrong – namely that God determines for us what is right and wrong – one can then ask the questions: What if God decreed that rape and murder were morally acceptable? Would that make them so?

While some might answer yes, I think most believers would say no, God would not make such a decree. But why not? Presumably because God would have some reason for not making such a decree. Again, presumably this is because reason suggests that rape and murder are not morally acceptable. But if God would have to appeal to reason, then why not eliminate the middleman entirely?”

-Steven Pinker, as paraphrased by Lawrence Krauss in “A Universe From Nothing“, pg. 171-172.

Comments { 0 }

Julia Sweeney: Letting Go of God

In “Letting Go of God” (Audiobook, DVD), Julia Sweeney shares her personal testimony with great thought and humor throughout. It is a journey much like my own – one where she set out to find God, only to come up empty.

Here is an excerpt:

I’d recommend “Letting Go of God” to pretty much anyone. As one amazon reviewer said: “Whether you’re a Believer, an Atheist, a Humanist, or just someone who hasn’t really thought about it, this will pull at your heart strings, make you pee your pants laughing, and best of all, make you THINK.”

Comments { 0 }

Should the archaeological findings of Jericho and Sodom & Gomorrah (and other Bible stories) be considered evidence to support the claim that the Bible is true?

Many Christians will turn to archaeological evidence in an attempt to support the integrity of the Bible. They’ll talk about how archaeologists have discovered the Wall of Jericho, or bricks in Babylon that bear the name of Nebuchadnezzar, or Roman inscriptions mentioning Pontius Pilate, or massive amounts of sulfur surrounding the supposed locations of Sodom and Gomorrah where the Bible tells us that God rained down fire and brimstone – and they’ll insist that these evidences affirm the Bible as being true.

The purpose of this article isn’t to suggest that the Bible isn’t true, but to rather explain why it isn’t reasonable to consider such evidences as support for the factual validity of the Biblical narratives. The three points I am going to make are:

  1. Just because a person or place is historically real, it doesn’t mean that any story that includes those people or places is true.
  2. There are alternative explanations for the empirical evidence that has been found.
  3. We have no reason to believe that the Bible stories are factual records of historical events. Continue Reading →
Comments { 5 }

God’s Slavery Speech: Leviticus 25:44-46

What God Said (Leviticus 25:44-46, NIV):

“Your male and female slaves are to come from the nations around you; from them you may buy slaves. You may also buy some of the temporary residents living among you and members of their clans born in your country, and they will become your property. You can bequeath them to your children as inherited property and can make them slaves for life, but you must not rule over your fellow Israelites ruthlessly.”

What a perfect, moral, loving God could have said:

“No more male and female slaves are to come from the nations around you or anywhere; from them, you may never again buy slaves. Slavery is a moral outrage and must end immediately. You may not buy any of the temporary residents living among you nor members of their clans born in your country. They’re people, just like you, and you are to treat them with the kind of respect you would want for yourself. They will never be your property. You cannot bequeath them to your children because they are not your property. Take the slaves you now have and make them free for life; and you must never rule over any human ruthlessly.”

(via Youtube: “The King of Kings’ Speech”)

To me, this is just one of countless examples where it seems evident that the Bible is the work of mere men who were using the ‘voice of the divine’ for social and political purposes.

Why did humanity have to wait thousands of years for the Emancipation Declaration? Couldn’t Yahweh have delivered it himself? Couldn’t he have at least not offered support for the disgusting practice of slavery? Or if one argues that he wasn’t offering support but rather creating better laws for slavery, it is at least absolutely clear that he wasn’t condemning the practice altogether even though he had the opportunity, as he was condemning all sorts of things outright in Leviticus.

Strangely, the Bible paints a picture of a God who knew slavery was bad (“must not rule over your fellow Israelites”) but didn’t bother instructing against it in the case of non-Israelites. I suppose instead of correcting this moral embarrassment, God was busy with far more important priorities… like worrying about foreskins (Genesis 17), punishing to death those who picked up sticks on the Sabbath (Numbers 15:32), and commanding that nobody should wear clothing woven of multiple materials (Leviticus 19:19).

It is mind-boggling for me to imagine that an omnipotent, omniscient, omnipresent supernatural entity – one who can create a grand cosmos full of wonder – couldn’t have done a better job in revealing himself as well as his perfect moral insights to humanity.

Comments { 24 }

Deism and Atheism: Not World’s Apart

During a brief back and forth religious discussion, I was asked: “If you don’t have a problem with Deism then are you a Deist, as apposed to Atheist/Agnostic? Because as you know, they are worlds apart. Also what do you mean by Deist?”

Well, nope… I am not a deist. I am an agnostic atheist who considers the origins of the universe to be unknown. The view of deism that I am using is one that defines “god” as something that got the ball rolling but then disappeared or kept himself at a distance – no supernatural revelation or divine intervention.

The reason I don’t see atheism and deism as world’s apart is that they both agree with natural explanations as opposed to magic. The lone major disagreement, which I wouldn’t consider to be world’s apart, is the origins of the universe. The atheist will say “I don’t know” and wait for evidence while the deist will say “god did it”. When asked about the characteristics of this god, deists will say “I don’t know”. To me, this seems quite similar to saying “I don’t know” to the origins of the universe.

Perhaps atheism and deism would align almost perfectly if it weren’t for semantics regarding the term “god”, which a deist uses far differently than a theist does. This “god” – whatever it was that ultimately caused our origins – could be anything. This “god” could even turn out to be a natural process or element that we haven’t yet discovered or don’t yet understand.

Comments { 2 }

How do atheists respond to near-death experiences?

The same way as Christians… except in how they interpret the experience.

Comments { 0 }

A few thoughts on the “Hey Brother” womb analogy

This meme has been shared by a few different Christian friends on my Facebook news feed – and it seems the message is that theism is the most reasonable approach while atheism, or a reliance on empirical evidence, is perhaps irrational. Here are a few of my thoughts:

1) Believing that something is ‘outside the womb’ doesn’t lead to Christianity…

The “do you believe in mom?” question is an attempt to parallel the experience of these unborn babies to our own human experience on earth and the question “do you believe in god?”. The problem is that since we are “in the womb”, we don’t have any reason to assert knowledge on what is outside unless there is empirical evidence. While the author of the meme knows there is a mother outside of the womb, it would be irrational for the babies to believe so unless they were presented with empirical evidence. Of course, this is sort of the point of the meme: that it seems irrational to believe that a mom exists, but one exists anyways! However, this lesson certainly shouldn’t lead to anything more than deism (certainly not Christianity).

Why believe in Yahweh instead of Apollo, Athena, Baal, Ganesha, Hades, Horus, Ishtar, Krishna, Mithras, Odin, Osiris, Poseidon, Rama, Thor, Vishnu, Zeus, or whatever other god? By downplaying the importance of evidence and rational thought, this meme leads to the view that we should believe any random untestable view to explain our existence… because somebody’s wild guess, which is nothing more than a shot in the dark, just might be right!

2) Even if you hear ‘mother’s voice’, there is no way to confirm the source…

While it is true that at some point while in the womb, the babies begin to hear and learn their mother’s voice – but again, they don’t know anything about the source. Christians will claim that they hear the voice of god speaking to them, but it seems unlikely that it is anything more than ones own conscience considering the many varying messages people hear that they all claim are from one god or another. Of course, there is always the fallback response that the devil is talking to others to create the inconsistent messages, but then how can we know which messages are from god (and which god?) and which ones are from the devil? And why does Yahweh confuse the issue further by playing silly mind games in the Bible such as telling Abraham to kill his own son, which basically teaches people of faith to follow whatever voice they hear, even if it says to do crazy things that are immoral and don’t make sense.

3) A good mommy would love her babies whether or not they chose to believe that she existed while they were in the womb.

We know that in the womb example, there is a mom after all. But it’s important to point out that any good mom would love the babies regardless of whether or not the baby knew there was a mom or cherished the relationship. In my studies, this is certainly not the case with Christianity. If you don’t believe in god and don’t have a good relationship with Jesus, then you are going to hell. The Christian portray of god is one that doesn’t care if you were stuck in a womb without any way to know for sure whether or not He exists, you either believe or you don’t believe. And if you don’t believe, it doesn’t matter how nice of a person you are, you will be sentenced to hell. End of story.

Here are a few Bible verses that support this view:

John 14:6: “Jesus answered, ‘I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me.’”

Acts 4:12: “Salvation is found in no one else, for there is no other name under heaven given to mankind by which we must be saved.”

Galatians 2:16: “A person is not justified by the works of the law, but by faith in Jesus Christ. So we, too, have put our faith in Christ Jesus that we may be justified by faith in Christ and not by the works of the law, because by the works of the law no one will be justified.”

Galatians 3:11: “Clearly no one who relies on the law is justified before God, because ‘the righteous will live by faith.’”

Ephesians 2:8,9: “For it is by grace you have been saved, through faith—and this is not from yourselves, it is the gift of God — not by works, so that no one can boast.”

Titus 3:5: “He saved us, not because of righteous things we had done, but because of his mercy. He saved us through the washing of rebirth and renewal by the Holy Spirit.”

4) How far do you take the womb analogy?

Religions have taken the view that “there must be something out there” to the point where they have given this entity numerous names, attributed all sorts of characteristics to it including the belief that it hears our every thought and judges our every action, created holy books that claim to be given by the authority of this mysterious entity and provide moral rules that we must follow for a great reward (or else we will face a severe punishment), built massive constructs in its many names, and spend a significant amount of time trying to communicate to it to ask for help as well as praise it for everything good and apologize for all of our failures to adhere by its rules.

But why stop there? This same reasoning can of course be used to believe in other things such as Santa Claus, the Easter Bunny, the tooth fairy, alien abductions, bigfoot, demons, and so forth. And of course, if we want to keep moving forward with this silly analogy, we could always take it a step further. Even if it turns out that there is a god and we all end up in heaven, we could always wonder if there is another “layer” to that reality. “Hey Brother, do you think there’s a SuperGod that created god?” Why not?

5) The best response is to live in reality…

We can speculate forever on what exists ‘beyond’ our senses. Maybe there is a big supernatural battle going on that we cannot sense. Maybe we live in a matrix. Maybe your brain is the only one that exists and everything else is a self-projected fantasy world? It can be a lot of fun to speculate and guess – and such speculation can also lead to a better understanding of reality as we continue to test our various hypotheses and theories. Curiosity is a good thing. However, we must be grounded by reality. We need to understand the difference between “knowledge” and “speculation” and treat each accordingly. We should not claim to know with certainty things that cannot be known, especially if such views lead to intolerance of others and close-mindedness in our continued search for answers.

Comments { 18 }

God is the answer to everything…

Here is a short video to illustrate that no matter how reality acts out, some believers always perceive that there was a loving God who did it or allowed it to happen for the right reasons. To me, it demonstrates how accepting the unproven premise that “there is a loving personal god who is involved in every aspect of our lives” hugely impacts the way somebody will perceive reality, even to the point of bending over backwards to justify this worldview.

Comments { 11 }

Christopher Hitchens Tribute

Here’s a well-done tribute video that I came across on Facebook via The Sagan Series.

Comments { 1 }